Evaluating user request options
I see that the user might want a simple response, but I think it’s good to flag any inconsistencies. I should ask if they prefer verification or a rewrite. I could also offer a couple of punchy headline variants: something concise, data-driven, and maybe a comparison version. Keeping it short and sweet is key here. Let’s make it impactful and clear!
这是要我核查还是想改写成更顺的标题？
提醒：普利希奇自2023年才踢意甲，目前严格算只有两个赛季， “近3个赛季意甲直接参与48球、追平劳塔罗”这说法大概率不准或语义不清（可能指近3季所有联赛，或意甲球员榜单中的并列）。需要我帮你核对并给出处吗？
如果只是想润色标题，给你几个版本：
- 数据直述：普利希奇近三季直接参与48球，与劳塔罗并列第一
- 强调榜首：近三季直参48球！普利希奇追平劳塔罗登顶意甲
- 对比版：普利希奇直参48球追平劳塔罗，近三季意甲并列第一
选1）我去核查并给来源；2）按你目标平台继续优化标题；3）给分赛季明细与图表。